Respond to This

New Guns n' Roses.. ugh

Why did they do this? It's.. not pretty in my
opinion. Anybody like it?
Responses
Respond to this

Re: New Guns n' Roses.. ugh

11/25/2008 12:13 AM

Kyle Neufeld (803) wrote:

only heard the track 'shacklers revenge'. I thought it was a pretty good, pretty catchy song. Haven't heard the CD, but the one song was good. Chorus was a bit generic in a way, but still excellent in my opinion. Is the whole cd in a similar style to shacklers revenge? The new style doesn't faze me, I like GnR, but I'm not die hard or a purist or anything.

I'm curious why you don't like it, haven't heard much about it yet. Gonna read up on it.






Respond to this

Re: New Guns n' Roses.. ugh

11/25/2008 1:17 PM

Bryan Morrison (9786) wrote:

I pretty much agree with what Michael said.

It's very grungy.. and electronic. I also think the vocals are just wacked out. I remember hearing one song that was decent though. Can't remember which one.



Respond to this

Re: New Guns n' Roses.. ugh

11/25/2008 2:17 PM

Michael Laurance (4040) wrote:

Yeah, that's the other thing. The vocals are all weird and very processed. Someone got carried away with the Eventide Harmonizer! Hopefully it sounds better on the CD than on the myspace page.

Respond to this

Re: New Guns n' Roses.. ugh

11/25/2008 8:53 AM

Michael Laurance (4040) wrote:

I listened to 3 tracks on their myspace page. It was rediculous. It sounded like a Queensryche rip off. The drums sounded like a machine, there were a lot of keyboards, noises, choir voices, and this sporatic, poorly-placed shredding guitar. I was never a GNR fan, but I could appreciate the greasy LA sound. This was over-processed, over-thought drivel.

Respond to this

Re: New Guns n' Roses.. ugh

11/25/2008 9:47 AM

Adrian Dupree (4969) wrote:

IT's certainly different sounding. Although I don't really listen to Guns and Roses. I didn't think it sounded too bad though. More grungy and heavy sounding but overall it's okay to me.



Adrian