Share This Thread A New Low Chris Bond II (1808) Miscellaneous Forum 8/20/2008 9:37:59 PM · 40 Views [Respond to this Message] 1 message post in 24 hours.

Responses  [ Pages: 1 · 2 ]

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/21/2008 6:26:29 AM Adrian Dupree (6318) wrote: Probably just a "wholenote recession." Happens sometimes.

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 12:44:07 AM Chris Bond II (1808) wrote: I remember a time when there was a couple hundred messges posted a day. This site I fear is just archaic. Its tecnology is ten years old. State of the art in its day, now a buggy amongst automobiles. Tecnology that now exists- For lessons/instruction: Platform that can understand direct plug-in from guitar, create tablature/standard notation in real-time. For member interaction: Live video feed between members. Several memebers actually playing at once. Making the site accessible for all players, including drummers and bass players. In other words, you could rehearse/jam as a band in realtime, from different locales. For self study; Realistic backing sound and groove creation. A simple archive of conventional information that can be followed in block format similar to curricculum taught throughout. Soon such a site will be available, but I doubt it will be this one.

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 6:26:28 AM Edward Azbell (1006) wrote: This site would be perfect for those kind of features. It is ranked #1 on Beesker.

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 8:23:40 AM Bill North (11974) wrote: Let's not forget that this site and Active Bass were in actuality lab experiments for social intereactions on the net. A great many members left after "Ma Geezer" let the cat out of the bag. I ould be extremely suprised if this site will ever recieve any meaningful upgrades as it's job is over... Bill~~~

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 8:37:26 AM Chris Bond II (1808) wrote: Yeah, I remember that...or rather forgot about that. What were the specifics again?

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 7:20:08 PM Bill North (11974) wrote: Chris, I guess that those of us who were not upset about it remember little about the details. Those of us who were not upset are still here. I seem to remember that it was a graduate program in creating and manipulating internet communities. I have no idea what it was going to be applied to. Bill~~~

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/25/2008 11:52:57 AM Randy Hano (6661) wrote: I agree. Granted with the way blogging and the way numerous communities have headed, the practicality of this site has kept it simple and easy to work along with good tenants. Why else would I keep visiting???

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 4:18:47 PM Jeff Rice (3272) wrote: So what's wrong with being lab rats? -Jeff

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 7:21:31 PM Bill North (11974) wrote: Unfortunately those who took objection to it are no longer available to answer your question. Bill~~~

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/23/2008 10:48:25 AM Dale Lindsey (7850) wrote: The United States has been called "The Great Experiment". Uh-Oh, all us Americans better pack up and leave! Seriously, what's wrong with being part of a successful experiment? Being part of a failed one could be a drag, though, depending on the circumstances. -Dale

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 6:10:32 PM Craig Lindsey (5430) wrote: Sometimes in life, worrying about the new lows brings forth newer lows. Yeah, no upgrades to the site of significance expected by me. I still enjoy logging on though, and reading folks I remember, the testy theory threads, and hearing about the fresh concerts. And so forth. Meeting old and new friends. I sure don't blame any web sites for me not having learned anything very new lately. Wish I personally had something new to add, but at my age, I am ecstatic just remember where middle C is on the piano....crank out a few jazz chords not in the books, etc. I appreciate you contributers and reading other entries. CL

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/22/2008 7:22:32 PM Bill North (11974) wrote: +1 on most of your sentiments, Craig.

• Respond to this Re: A New Low, Or high. 8/22/2008 9:30:06 PM Craig Lindsey (5430) wrote: Wow Bill. Those are some great photos on your site. I would like to discuss medium-priced Nikon stuff with you. Pick your brain, as it were. I have a couple old F bodies for sale, 35mm, wonder if they are worth anything on trade? Especially good job with the critter shots, enjoyed them plenty. Craig

• Respond to this Re: A New Low, Or high. 8/22/2008 10:11:13 PM Bill North (11974) wrote: Craig, I am at your disposal any time you wish. Just let me know, ok? Bill~~~

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/29/2008 8:57:26 PM Tracy Hardy Johnson (11617) wrote: . . . A great many members left after "Ma Geezer" let the cat out of the bag . . . Actually, it was one of the low-end faithful from ActiveBass who happened across that research reference while looking for something else, as I recall. I was just the messenger for it. See, I do lurk, even though I don't say much anymore . . . :) Ma "internet, schminternet" Geezer

• Respond to this Re: A New Low 8/30/2008 7:38:33 AM Carl Phillips (11819) wrote: Yeah whatever. It's your fault and you know it!! LOL!!! Carl

More Responses  [ Pages: 1 · 2 ]

© 1999-2010 eTonal Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  WholeNote is a registered trademark of eTonal Media, Inc. Please read our Privacy Statement and the Terms and Conditions under which this service is provided to you. Thanks for spending time with us at WholeNote.com. Check out ActiveMusician.com, FunkyKids.com and lighting-controller.biz as well.